On my first trip to Asia, I was told that I was totally
predictable for being a Rooster. Among other obvious traits people immediately
had noticed in me were independence and curiosity, as I was told over a dinner
where chicken and pork were successively served.
… Last night, I decided to read, in original
Italian, a book recommended by a friend—Alessandro Baricco’s “Mr. Gwyn”. I was also
told that the moon was full in Cancer, and therefore it was a good time to do
what I had not done for a while. So I decided to read that book.
I found my return to reading in Italian most
enjoyable, and the full moon a bit spooky. But it was the charming thesis of
the book, to look for a story in people’s character and to capture it, that fit
effortlessly into my roosterness, since my curiosity as a photographer and
writer had always been about stories in people, especially when they did not
know they had a story to tell.
But what about my independence? Can one be curious
without depending on others to satisfy his curiosity? Can a scientist uncover
while totally detached from the subject? Would a portrait be as telling about
the person if that person had not posed for it? Would a writer be independent
from the person of whom he is writing the portrait, as Mr. Gwyn decided to do?
Is it possible that I am not a true Rooster?
I stopped reading, looked at the moon, and decided
to do a search on Google. I typed “Chinese Zodiac Rooster.” The cartoon of a
rooster showed up on top of the search result. I clicked on it.
Acute, neat, meticulous, organized, self-assured, decisive,
conservative, critical, perfectionist, alert, zealous, practical, scientific,
responsible. Can be over zealous and critical, puritanical, egotistical,
abrasive, opinionated, given to empty bravado.
I quickly calculated that there were 14 positive
traits and 7 negative ones. I liked the ratio, although wondered if the 14
positives were part of the empty bravado.
Did not matter, overall a rooster seemed a good thing to be.
Next, wanted to know what happens to a Rooster in
the Year of the Horse. So, did a new search “Rooster, Year of the Horse.” It
read:
“A positive,
yet realistic outlook is the key to making the most of this year. Now's the
time to make the most of your skills, like your attention to detail and innate
leadership ability. You can do a lot with the five auspicious months of this
year -- while the Horse favors you, it's also a Wood year, which can clash with
Metal, your fixed element.”
I clearly needed to know more about that clash
between the Wood and the Metal. But I had enough to think about already and
decided to postpone that last search.
Back to reading my book.
“Traduttore, pensò.
Ma da che lingua?
Alla fine, l’unica
cosa chiara che gli venne in mente fu una parola : copista. Gli sarebbe piaciuto fare il copista. Non era un mestiere
vero, se ne rendeva conto, ma c’era un riverbero in quella parola che lo
convinceva, e gli faceva credere di cercare qulcosa di preciso. »
That was it! I was searching for the distinction
between a translator and a duplicator. Was it the moon, full in Cancer, guiding
the flow of my thoughts? Chinese Zodiac, full moon, Alessandro Baricco and my
curiosity to learn more about becoming who I am.
Not a duplicator. That much I knew. The Metal as my
fixed element, I had to be a translator. One who translates steel to Damascus
blades; one who translates a look into a portrait.
… I read a bit more. What was still unclear to me
was not the role of translator, since I consider art as translation not
creation, but that of identity and belonging. Where does a rooster find its
niche for translating? Where does he feel independent to do so? And, will his
curiosity eventually make him face his ultimate weakness, that of impulsive compassion?
Then I remembered a photo I had taken in Morocco of
a crane sitting in its nest atop a tower in ruin. It was perhaps the full moon,
but I thought I took that picture somehow knowing that it represents a
metaphor.
Maybe it does now.
January 16, 2014
© Vahé Kazandjian, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment